Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.
This text of 673 S.E.2d 864 (Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
As to the issue of the trial court’s personal jurisdiction over defendant Bernie R. Erde, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals majority for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion and instruct that court to reinstate the trial court’s denial of Mr. Erde’s motion to dismiss. We further conclude that the petition of defendant Energex Batteries, Inc. for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 S.E.2d 864, 363 N.C. 5, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saft-america-inc-v-plainview-batteries-inc-nc-2009.