Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.

673 S.E.2d 864, 363 N.C. 5, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 109

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 6, 2009·No. 204A08·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue of the trial court’s personal jurisdiction over defendant Bernie R. Erde, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals majority for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion and instruct that court to reinstate the trial court’s denial of Mr. Erde’s motion to dismiss. We further conclude that the petition of defendant Energex Batteries, Inc. for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

As to the issue of the trial court’s personal jurisdiction over defendant Bernie R. Erde, we reverse the decision of the Court of Appeals majority for the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion and instruct that court to reinstate the trial court’s denial of Mr. Erde’s motion to dismiss. We further conclude that the petition of defendant Energex Batteries, Inc. for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.

REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED.

Justice TIMMONS-GOODSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc., 673 S.E.2d 864, 363 N.C. 5, 2009 N.C. LEXIS 109 (N.C. 2009).

Pincite

673 S.E.2d 864 (Saft America, Inc. v. Plainview Batteries, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related