Safron v. McBurney

112 A. 677, 269 Pa. 392, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 573
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 14, 1921·No. Appeal, No. 242·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam,

A bill in equity, praying specific performance of a contract for sale of real estate and an abatement of purchase price, because defendants, admittedly, cannot convey the full title they contracted to sell, was dismissed on demurrer, and plaintiff has appealed.

We adopt the opinion of the learned President Judge of the court below, which satisfactorily disposes of the case.

' The decree is affirmed at cost of appellant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safron v. McBurney, 112 A. 677, 269 Pa. 392, 1921 Pa. LEXIS 573 (Pa. 1921).

112 A. 677 (Safron v. McBurney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McKenzie v. Sutton
34 So. 2d 825 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1948)
Mitchell v. White
14 So. 2d 687 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1943)
Salaman v. Knee
7 Pa. D. & C. 719 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1925)
Kreuer v. Union National Bank
119 A. 921 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1923)
Medoff v. Vandersaal
116 A. 525 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1921)