Safner v. Gollin
117 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 576, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 246
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should he affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Katzenbach in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, CHiee Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, White, Heppenheimbr, Williams, Gardner, Ackerson, Yan Buskikk, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Safner v. Gollin, 117 A. 927, 97 N.J.L. 576, 1922 N.J. LEXIS 246 (N.J. 1922).
117 A. 927 (Safner v. Gollin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.