Safir v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America
This text of 60 F.3d 817 (Safir v. Prudential Ins. Co. of America) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
60 F.3d 817
Marshall P. Safir
v.
Prudential Insurance Company of America, CSX Corporation,
Malcolm McLean Industries, Inc., Lykes Bros. Steamship Co.,
Inc., American President Companies Ltd., Farrell Lines,
Haight, Gardner, Poor and Havens, Weil, Gotshal and Manges,
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley and McCloy, Gilmartin, Poster and
Shafto, Dewey, Ballantine, Bushby, Palmer & Woods, Eugene
Nickerson, Judge, Connecticut Natiional Bank & Trust
Company, Puerto Rican Maritime Shipping
NO. 94-5770
United States Court of Appeals,
Third Circuit.
May 04, 1995
Appeal From: D.N.J., No. 94-cv-02094,
Barry, J.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 F.3d 817, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 15243, 1995 WL 392826, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safir-v-prudential-ins-co-of-america-ca3-1995.