Safi Apparel Corporation

CourtArmed Services Board of Contract Appeals
DecidedJuly 11, 2016
DocketASBCA No. 59747, 59988
StatusPublished

This text of Safi Apparel Corporation (Safi Apparel Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Safi Apparel Corporation, (asbca 2016).

Opinion

ARMED SERVICES BOARD OF CONTRACT APPEALS

Appeals of -- ) ) Safi Apparel Corporation ) ASBCA Nos. 59747, 59988 ) Under Contract Nos. W91B4M-09-D-0042 ) W91B4M-10-A-0033 )

APPEARANCE FOR THE APPELLANT: Alexander J. Brittin, Esq. Brittin Law Group, PLLC McLean, VA

APPEARANCES FOR THE GOVERNMENT: Raymond M. Saunders, Esq. Army Chief Trial Attorney MAJ Julie A. Glascott, JA Trial Attorney

SUMMARY BINDING DECISION BY ADMINISTRATIVE JUDGE WOODROW

By agreement dated 14 June 2016, the parties elected to have this matter considered and decided through a summary proceeding with binding decision pursuant to the Board's Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) procedures. The parties have agreed that the Board's "decision shall be final, conclusive, not subject to reconsideration or appeal, and may not be set aside, except for fraud or misconduct" (ADR Agreement ~ 15). This decision will have no precedential value.

The Board conducted a three-day evidentiary hearing on 21 June 2016. Each party was represented by counsel and had the opportunity to present evidence and testimony to the Board, and to cross-examine witnesses presented by the opposing party.

DECISION

The Board has carefully considered the testimony of the witnesses, the documents in the Rule 4 file, and the contentions of the parties in their pre-hearing briefs and at the conclusion of the hearing. We find that Brigadier General Blake's statement that he would "pay Safi's costs" is not sufficient to create an implied-in-fact contract to pay appellant's incurred costs. In addition, we find that LTC Willingham did not ratify an

l I j unauthorized agreement to pay appellant's incurred costs. Therefore, the appeals are denied.

Dated: 11July2016

Administrative Judge Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

I certify that the foregoing is a true copy of the Opinion and Decision of the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals in ASBCA Nos. 59747, 59988, Appeals of Safi Apparel Corporation, rendered in conformance with the Board's Charter.

Dated:

JEFFREY D. GARDIN Recorder, Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Safi Apparel Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safi-apparel-corporation-asbca-2016.