Safford v. United States

216 F. Supp. 226, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1428, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9377
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin
DecidedApril 30, 1963
DocketNos. 61-C-170, 61-C-171
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 F. Supp. 226 (Safford v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Wisconsin primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Safford v. United States, 216 F. Supp. 226, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1428, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9377 (E.D. Wis. 1963).

Opinion

GRUBB, District Judge.

These actions, consolidated for purposes of trial, are for refunds of income taxes, interest, and penalties paid by plaintiffs for the year 1954. Plaintiff, Norah J. Safford, seeks a refund in the amount of $3,799.20. Plaintiffs, Noel Ross Safford II and Rosalie Safford,1 seek a refund in the amount of $3,632.07. The pertinent facts are as follows:

Noel Ross Safford died intestate on January 12, 1953. He was survived by his widow, Norah J. Safford, and his son, Noel Ross Safford II, who inherited his personal estate in equal shares. Noel Ross Safford II was appointed administrator of the estate.

At his death, Noel Ross Safford was a partner in the firm of architects doing business as “Foeller, Schober, Berners, Safford and Jahn” in Green Bay, Wisconsin. The partnership reported for United States income tax purposes on a calendar year for 1952 and prior years. Following the death of Noel Ross Saf-ford, the surviving partners filed a United States partnership income tax return for the short period from January 1, 1953 through January 31, 1953. Thereafter t'he surviving partners filed a United States partnership income tax return for the fiscal year February 1, 1953 through January 31, 1954.

There was no written partnership agreement at the time of Noel Ross Saf-ford’s death, but there had been an oral agreement that profits would be divided equally among the four partners without regard to which partner brought in a job or which partner worked on it, and that profits from business done before Leonard M. Schober became a partner would be divided among the other three partners.2

The partnership kept its books and reported its income for United States income tax purposes on an accrual basis, using a “percentage of completion” method. In accruing income, the partnership accrued not only all amounts that had been billed but also the percentage of the fees which would be due on the completion of the next stage of the work which was in process. Thus, all work done to the end of the taxable year was to be accrued as income whether billed or not.

On December 31, 1952, the book value of Noel Ross Safford’s partnership interest was $25,109.10, consisting of original capital in the amount of $2,500 plus un-drawn profits of $22,609.10. Following

[228]*228216 FEDERAL SUPPLEMENT. his death, the surviving partners paid to his estate the following amounts:

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Max M. v. Thompson
585 F. Supp. 317 (N.D. Illinois, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
216 F. Supp. 226, 11 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1428, 1963 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safford-v-united-states-wied-1963.