Safford v. George A. Fuller Co.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Safford v. George A. Fuller Co.

82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 143

DecidedJuly 21, 1911

StatusPublished

This text of 82 A. 1133 (Safford v. George A. Fuller Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Safford v. George A. Fuller Co., 82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 143 (Me. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

Action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiff for $510. Defendant moved for a new trial. The rescript says: "A careful examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence, if believed by the jury, to warrant their finding upon the question of liability, but upon the assessment of damages they are clearly excessive. While the verdict is not large, in itself, it is, nevertheless, double the amount wa,rranted by the testimony, and upon this feature of the case the defendant is as much entitled to a judicial judgment as the plaintiff is upon the question of liability. It is the opinion of the court that so much of the verdict as in excess of $300 should be remitted.”

Motion sustained, unless within thirty [559]*559days from the date of the certification of this decision, the plaintiff file a remittitur of all of the verdict in excess of three hundred dollars.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action on the case to recover damages for personal injuries caused by the alleged negligence of the defendant. Plea, the general issue. Verdict for plaintiff for $510. Defendant moved for a new trial. The rescript says: "A careful examination of the record discloses sufficient evidence, if believed by the jury, to warrant their finding upon the question of liability, but upon the assessment of damages they are clearly excessive. While the verdict is not large, in itself, it is, nevertheless, double the amount wa,rranted by the testimony, and upon this feature of the case the defendant is as much entitled to a judicial judgment as the plaintiff is upon the question of liability. It is the opinion of the court that so much of the verdict as in excess of $300 should be remitted.”

Motion sustained, unless within thirty [559]*559days from the date of the certification of this decision, the plaintiff file a remittitur of all of the verdict in excess of three hundred dollars.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

82 A. 1133, 108 Me. 558, 1911 Me. LEXIS 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safford-v-george-a-fuller-co-me-1911.