Saffold v. Navarro

15 Tex. 76
CourtTexas Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 15 Tex. 76 (Saffold v. Navarro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saffold v. Navarro, 15 Tex. 76 (Tex. 1855).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

It was the right of the plaintiff in the Court, below, to dismiss as to the defendant not served, and take judgment against his co-defendants, who were served with process. (Hart. Dig., Art. 704.) Having erroneously taken judgment against the defendant not, served, no reason is perceived why the defendant in error may not confess errors and have the case dismissed as to him, without affecting the judgment as to the other defendants. They cannot have been prejudiced by the rendition of judgment against their co-defendant; and the error is not one of which they can complain. The judgment will be reversed and the cause dismissed, as to the defendant and plaintiff in error, Bird Saffold, at the cost of the defénd- and in error, and affirmed as to the other defendants.

Judgment re-formed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Richey
18 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1929)
Holt v. Love
63 Tex. Civ. App. 65 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1910)
Shreeder v. Davis
86 P. 198 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
Bates-Smith Investment Co. v. Scott
76 N.W. 1063 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1898)
Wootters v. Kauffman
3 S.W. 465 (Texas Supreme Court, 1887)
Martin v. Crow
28 Tex. 613 (Texas Supreme Court, 1866)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 Tex. 76, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saffold-v-navarro-tex-1855.