Saffioti v. Catherwood

Second Circuit

Saffioti v. Catherwood

417 F.2d 971

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedNovember 4, 1969

DocketNo. 222, Docket 33764

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 417 F.2d 971 (Saffioti v. Catherwood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saffioti v. Catherwood, 417 F.2d 971 (2d Cir. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks money damages for alleged violations of his constitutional rights, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985. He maintains that these rights were in some way denied to him in connection with certain administrative proceedings conducted by the Division of Employment Security of the New York State Department of Labor. In accord with the holding of the trial judge below, Judge Bonsai of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 305 F.Supp. 989, we find that appellant received due process in compliance with the requirements of state law, and that there is no merit to his claims that he has suffered the loss of any federal constitutional protection.

We affirm the judgment below on the opinion of Judge Bonsai.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks money damages for alleged violations of his constitutional rights, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983, 1985. He maintains that these rights were in some way denied to him in connection with certain administrative proceedings conducted by the Division of Employment Security of the New York State Department of Labor. In accord with the holding of the trial judge below, Judge Bonsai of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, 305 F.Supp. 989, we find that appellant received due process in compliance with the requirements of state law, and that there is no merit to his claims that he has suffered the loss of any federal constitutional protection.

We affirm the judgment below on the opinion of Judge Bonsai.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

417 F.2d 971, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saffioti-v-catherwood-ca2-1969.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack