Saffian v. Netter
This text of 284 A.D. 1034 (Saffian v. Netter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In view of the long period in which the action was pending, there is no satisfactory proof that the facts alleged as newly discovered evidence could not have been discovered during the years the ease was pending. Moreover, if the alleged newly discovered evidence had been produced, it is not reasonably likely that it would have changed the result. Order unanimously affirmed. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Peck, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
284 A.D. 1034, 136 N.Y.S.2d 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saffian-v-netter-nyappdiv-1954.