SAFFERFIELD v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

SAFFERFIELD v. State

73 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2011 WL 5057091

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 25, 2011·No. 1D11-4597·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus, to the extent it challenges pretrial actions by counsel and the trial judge, is premature because those issues can be raised on appeal from final judgment. The petition is therefore denied in part. Insofar as the petition complains of former counsel’s failure to provide petitioner with records upon request, the petition is also denied but without prejudice to petitioner’s right to seek relief in circuit court. See Dumas v. *320 Marrero, 864 So.2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

PETITION DENIED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus, to the extent it challenges pretrial actions by counsel and the trial judge, is premature because those issues can be raised on appeal from final judgment. The petition is therefore denied in part. Insofar as the petition complains of former counsel’s failure to provide petitioner with records upon request, the petition is also denied but without prejudice to petitioner’s right to seek relief in circuit court. See Dumas v. *320 Marrero, 864 So.2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

PETITION DENIED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

SAFFERFIELD v. State, 73 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2011 WL 5057091 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

73 So. 3d 319 (SAFFERFIELD v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related