Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/SAFFERFIELD v. State

SAFFERFIELD v. State

73 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2011 WL 5057091
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 25, 2011
Docket1D11-4597
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 73 So. 3d 319 (SAFFERFIELD v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SAFFERFIELD v. State, 73 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2011 WL 5057091 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of mandamus, to the extent it challenges pretrial actions by counsel and the trial judge, is premature because those issues can be raised on appeal from final judgment. The petition is therefore denied in part. Insofar as the petition complains of former counsel’s failure to provide petitioner with records upon request, the petition is also denied but without prejudice to petitioner’s right to seek relief in circuit court. See Dumas v. *320 Marrero, 864 So.2d 531 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004).

PETITION DENIED.

THOMAS, ROBERTS, and CLARK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wimberly v. State
73 So. 3d 319 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 So. 3d 319, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 16829, 2011 WL 5057091, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safferfield-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.