SAFETY NAT. CAS. CORP. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds

558 F.3d 599
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 11, 2009
Docket06-30262
StatusPublished

This text of 558 F.3d 599 (SAFETY NAT. CAS. CORP. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
SAFETY NAT. CAS. CORP. v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyds, 558 F.3d 599 (5th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

558 F.3d 599 (2009)

SAFETY NATIONAL CASUALTY CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellee,
Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen-Self Insurers Fund, Intervenor Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYDS LONDON; et al., Defendants,
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds London, Defendant-Appellant,
Certain Underwriters At Lloyds London, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Safety National Casualty Corporation; Louisiana Safety Association of Timbermen, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 06-30262.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

February 11, 2009.

William E. Scott, III, Watson, Blanche, Wilson & Posner, Baton Rouge, LA, Andrew K. Epting, Jr. (argued), Charleston, SC, Michael P. Wilson, Baton Rouge, LA, for Safety Nat. Cas. Corp.

Joseph John Bailey (argued), Provosty, Sadler, deLaunay, Fiorenza & Sobel, Alexandria, LA, for Louisiana Safety Ass'n of Timbermen-Self Insurers Fund.

Alan D. Ezkovich (argued), New Orleans, LA, James M. Garner, Joshua Simon Force, Sher Garner Cahill, Richter

Kelin & Hilbert, New Orleans, LA, Jacob Albert Airey, Airey & Blanchard, Slidell, LA, for Certain Underwriters at Lloyds London.

Before JONES, Chief Judge, and KING, JOLLY, DAVIS, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, GARZA, BENAVIDES, STEWART, DENNIS, CLEMENT, PRADO, OWEN, ELROD, SOUTHWICK and HAYNES, Circuit Judges.

BY THE COURT:

A member of the Court in active service having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc and a majority of the judges in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
558 F.3d 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safety-nat-cas-corp-v-certain-underwriters-at-lloyds-ca5-2009.