Safeguard Security, Inc. v. Ryan
225 A.D.2d 364, 639 N.Y.2d 689, 639 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2195
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 12, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
[365]*365Summary judgment was properly granted since plaintiff failed to come forward with any admissible proof of compensable damages (see, Brauner v Columbia Broadcasting Sys., 221 AD2d 306). Plaintiffs remaining contentions are without merit. Concur — Wallach, J. P., Ross, Nardelli, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Safeguard Security, Inc. v. Ryan, 225 A.D.2d 364, 639 N.Y.2d 689, 639 N.Y.S.2d 689, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2195 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 364 (Safeguard Security, Inc. v. Ryan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Modern Art Services, Ltd. v. OCA Long Island City
84 A.D.3d 1040 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)