SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. COM. PENNSYLVANIA INS. GUARANTY v. Joyce

539 A.2d 340, 517 Pa. 488, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 46
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided February 8, 1988·No. Petition 428 E.D. Allocatur Dkt. 1987·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The petition for allowance of appeal is granted, the order of Superior Court, 362 Pa.Super. 522, 524 A.2d 1362, is reversed, and the matter is remanded to the Court of Common Pleas of Philadelphia County, with instructions to dismiss the case. The Insurance Commissioner’s suspen *489 sion order of May 29, 1979, and the Commonwealth Court’s dissolution and liquidation order of April 21, 1982, precluded the institution or further prosecution of actions against Safeguard Mutual Insurance Company. Common Pleas Court was therefore without jurisdiction to entertain this matter.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. COM. PENNSYLVANIA INS. GUARANTY v. Joyce, 539 A.2d 340, 517 Pa. 488, 1988 Pa. LEXIS 46 (Pa. 1988).

539 A.2d 340 (SAFEGUARD MUTUAL INS. COM. PENNSYLVANIA INS. GUARANTY v. Joyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Peters Creek Sanitary Authority v. Welch
681 A.2d 167 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1996)
Peters Creek Sanitary Authority v. Welch
651 A.2d 226 (Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania, 1994)
Marble v. Fred Hill & Son
624 A.2d 190 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1993)
Lambeth v. Darlington
10 Pa. D. & C.4th 159 (Chester County Court of Common Pleas, 1991)
Francisco v. Ford Motor Co.
580 A.2d 374 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Horowitz v. Universal Underwriters Insurance
580 A.2d 395 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1990)
Ganassi v. Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C.
540 A.2d 272 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1988)