Safeco Insurance Co. v. Centennial Insurance Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Safeco Insurance Co. v. Centennial Insurance Co.

572 So. 2d 5, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2922

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 4, 1990

DocketNo. 90-788

StatusPublished

This text of 572 So. 2d 5 (Safeco Insurance Co. v. Centennial Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Safeco Insurance Co. v. Centennial Insurance Co., 572 So. 2d 5, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2922 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

There being no bona fide dispute on this record that the insured, at the time he applied for an automobile insurance policy in Colorado, notified the issuing company that he was a resident of the State of Florida, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment, which refused to enforce as contrary to Florida law the “other insurance clause of the contract” pursuant to Gillen v. United Services Automobile Association, 300 So.2d 3 (Fla.1974); Gordon v. Russell, 561 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Gustafson v. Jensen, 515 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Adams v. Brannan, 500 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore the summary judgment under review is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

There being no bona fide dispute on this record that the insured, at the time he applied for an automobile insurance policy in Colorado, notified the issuing company that he was a resident of the State of Florida, we affirm the trial court’s summary judgment, which refused to enforce as contrary to Florida law the “other insurance clause of the contract” pursuant to Gillen v. United Services Automobile Association, 300 So.2d 3 (Fla.1974); Gordon v. Russell, 561 So.2d 603 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990); Gustafson v. Jensen, 515 So.2d 1298 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Adams v. Brannan, 500 So.2d 236 (Fla. 3d DCA 1986). Therefore the summary judgment under review is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

572 So. 2d 5, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9123, 15 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 2922, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safeco-insurance-co-v-centennial-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack