Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. All Seasons Recreation, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. All Seasons Recreation, Inc.

54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14300

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 12, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 711 (Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. All Seasons Recreation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. All Seasons Recreation, Inc., 54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14300 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by insurers for the reformation, nunc pro tunc, of an all-purpose policy of insurance, the appeal is from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 19, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered thereon on January 6, 1976. Judgment and order affirmed, with one bill of costs. The evidence adduced at the trial fell far short, in strength and in credibility, of the standard of proof required to grant reformation of the contract of insurance, either on the basis of mutual mistake, or on the ground of fraud perpetrated on the insurers. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by insurers for the reformation, nunc pro tunc, of an all-purpose policy of insurance, the appeal is from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered December 19, 1975, which, after a nonjury trial, dismissed the complaint, and (2) the judgment of the same court, entered thereon on January 6, 1976. Judgment and order affirmed, with one bill of costs. The evidence adduced at the trial fell far short, in strength and in credibility, of the standard of proof required to grant reformation of the contract of insurance, either on the basis of mutual mistake, or on the ground of fraud perpetrated on the insurers. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Latham, Cohalan and Hawkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 711, 387 N.Y.S.2d 403, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14300, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safeco-insurance-co-of-america-v-all-seasons-recreation-inc-nyappdiv-1976.