Home/Fifth Circuit/Safe Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. Hill

Safe Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. Hill

301 F.2d 139
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1962
DocketNo. 19308
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 301 F.2d 139 (Safe Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Safe Harbor Enterprises, Inc. v. Hill, 301 F.2d 139 (5th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The only basis for this appeal is that “the appellees were contributorily negligent, and such negligence was the proximate cause of the collision herein, and for that reason the appellees should have been limited in their recovery to one-half damages.” The questions as to contributory negligence and as to proximate cause were fact questions. The findings of the trial court touching each of these matters was supported by the evidence, and this Court does not find such findings to be clearly erroneous.

The judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Noritake Co., Inc. v. M/v Hellenic Champion
627 F.2d 724 (Fifth Circuit, 1980)
S. C. Loveland, Inc., Cross-Appellant v. East West Towing, Inc., Cross-Appellee, E. & I., Inc., in Personam, and the Tug Miss Carolyn, Etc., in Rem., Cross-Appellees. State of Florida, Department of Transportation v. S. C. Loveland, Inc., St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. East West Towing, Inc.
608 F.2d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)
S. C. Loveland, Inc. v. East West Towing, Inc.
608 F.2d 160 (Fifth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
301 F.2d 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safe-harbor-enterprises-inc-v-hill-ca5-1962.