Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank

44 A. 1064, 194 Pa. 334, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 389
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided January 2, 1900·No. Appeal, No. 178·Published·Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Pee Curiam,

Upon the checks which were received by the administrator he had the undoubted right to draw the money and, if he chose, thereupon to deposit the money thus received to the credit of his own account, he had a perfect right to do so. What he did do was nothing more than the equivalent of such action on his part. The money having gone into his own account was subject to be drawn out upon his personal checks which the bank could not refuse to pay. The question is entirely different from the one which would arise if after the deposit was made it was claimed as money of the trust and the bank was notified of the claim before it was paid, but that is not this case.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank, 44 A. 1064, 194 Pa. 334, 1900 Pa. LEXIS 389 (Pa. 1900).

44 A. 1064 (Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Diamond National Bank) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Jones v. Van Norman
522 A.2d 503 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1987)
Bacher v. City Nat. Bk., Phila.
31 A.2d 725 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1943)
Pennsylvania Co. for Ins. v. Ninth Bk. T. Co.
158 A. 251 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1931)
Rodgers v. Bankers National Bank
229 N.W. 90 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1930)
New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. Robertson
278 P. 963 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
Life Insurance v. American National Bank
14 Va. Cir. 530 (Richmond Chancery Court, Virginia, 1919)
United States Fidelity Co. v. United States Nat. Bank
157 P. 155 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)