Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT
M.D. Appeal Dkt. 26 MAP 2018
SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY : No. 791 MAL 2017 : :
v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :
RENE ORIENTAL-GUILLERMO, RACHEL : DIXON, PRISCILA JIMENEZ, LUIS : JIMENEZ, ALLI LICONA AVILA AND IRIS : VELAZQUEZ :
: :
PETITION OF: PRISCILA JIMENEZ & : LUIS JIMENEZ :
ORDER
PER CURIAM
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is
GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:
a. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the terms and provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701, et. seq.?
b. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the public policy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as embodied in § 1786 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1786, which implicitly directs that all permissive users of an insured vehicle be insured under the owner’s insurance policy?
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez (Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.