Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 4, 2018·No. 791 MAL 2017 (Granted)·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA MIDDLE DISTRICT

M.D. Appeal Dkt. 26 MAP 2018

SAFE AUTO INSURANCE COMPANY : No. 791 MAL 2017 : :

v. : Petition for Allowance of Appeal from : the Order of the Superior Court :

RENE ORIENTAL-GUILLERMO, RACHEL : DIXON, PRISCILA JIMENEZ, LUIS : JIMENEZ, ALLI LICONA AVILA AND IRIS : VELAZQUEZ :

: :

PETITION OF: PRISCILA JIMENEZ & : LUIS JIMENEZ :

ORDER

PER CURIAM

AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2018, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is

GRANTED. The issues, as stated by Petitioners, are:

a. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the terms and provisions of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1701, et. seq.?

b. Did the Superior Court err as a matter of law in finding that the unlisted resident driver exclusion in a Personal Auto Policy is valid and enforceable and not violative of the public policy of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania as embodied in § 1786 of the Pennsylvania Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law, 75 Pa.C.S.A. § 1786, which implicitly directs that all permissive users of an insured vehicle be insured under the owner’s insurance policy?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez, (Pa. 2018).

Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez (Safe Auto v. Oriental-Guillermo Pet of: Jimenez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 1701
Pennsylvania § 1701
§ 1786
Pennsylvania § 1786