Safari v. Modjtahed
This text of Safari v. Modjtahed (Safari v. Modjtahed) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
PARVIZ SAFARI, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 82279 MANDANA ZAHEDL AN INDIVIDUAL; AND NOOSHIN ZAHEDI, AN INDIVIDUAL, Appellants, EILE 1.- 1 1
vs. JUN Z 2022 HAMID MODJTAHED, AN -.11114 BROWN INDIVIDUAL; AND MOHAMMAD AlliA1110"- -7:011 MOJTAHED, AN INDIVIDUAL, - -
Res ondents.
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b). It is so ORDERED.'
, C.J.
cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge The Powell Law Firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Las Vegas Wiley Petersen Eighth District Court Clerk
'Given this dismissal, this court takes no action on respondents' motion to substitute parties and for partial dismissal of this appeal. SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA
(0) 1947A
"
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Safari v. Modjtahed, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safari-v-modjtahed-nev-2022.