Safari v. Modjtahed

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided June 22, 2022·No. 82279·Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

PARVIZ SAFARI, AN INDIVIDUAL; No. 82279 MANDANA ZAHEDL AN INDIVIDUAL; AND NOOSHIN ZAHEDI, AN INDIVIDUAL,

Appellants,

EILE 1.- 1 1

vs. JUN Z 2022 HAMID MODJTAHED, AN -.11114 BROWN INDIVIDUAL; AND MOHAMMAD AlliA1110"- -7:011 MOJTAHED, AN INDIVIDUAL, - -

Res ondents.

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, this appeal is dismissed. The parties shall bear their own costs and attorney fees. NRAP 42(b).

It is so ORDERED.'

, C.J.

cc: Hon. Mark R. Denton, District Judge Kristine M. Kuzemka, Settlement Judge The Powell Law Firm Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck, LLP/Las Vegas Wiley Petersen Eighth District Court Clerk

'Given this dismissal, this court takes no action on respondents'

motion to substitute parties and for partial dismissal of this appeal.

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A

"

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Safari v. Modjtahed, (Neb. 2022).

Safari v. Modjtahed (Safari v. Modjtahed) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.