Safari Club International v. Rob Bonta
This text of Safari Club International v. Rob Bonta (Safari Club International v. Rob Bonta) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS SEP 22 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
SAFARI CLUB INTERNATIONAL, an No. 23-15199 Arizona nonprofit corporation; et al., D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellants, 2:22-cv-01395-DAD-JDP
v. MEMORANDUM* ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California Dale A. Drozd, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted June 28, 2023 Pasadena, California
Before: N.R. SMITH, LEE, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Safari Club International, et al., challenge the district court’s order denying a
preliminary injunction against the enforcement of California’s recently enacted
firearm-advertising law. Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 22949.80. For the reasons
outlined in Junior Sports Magazines v. Bonta, No. 22-56090 (9th Cir. Sept. 13,
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. 2023), we reverse the denial of preliminary injunction and remand for further
proceedings consistent with that opinion.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Safari Club International v. Rob Bonta, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/safari-club-international-v-rob-bonta-ca9-2023.