Saenger v. Commissioner
This text of 69 F.2d 633 (Saenger v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The denial of A. D. Saengesr’s petition (C. C. A.) 69 F. (2d) 631, denies Mrs. Saen-ger’s too. Co-owners of the income earned, they are co-payers of the tax on it.
Unlike in Earl’s Case, 281 U. S. Ill, 50 S. Ct. 241, 74 L. Ed. 731, husband and wile here are joint, not separate, earners. Together they are the tree. They share its fruits and the burdens of that sharing. Bender v. Pfaff, 282 U. S. 127, 51 S. Ct. 64, 75 L. Ed. 252.
The petition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
69 F.2d 633, 13 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 743, 1934 U.S. App. LEXIS 3618, 1934 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 9141, 13 A.F.T.R. (RIA) 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saenger-v-commissioner-ca5-1934.