Saenger Theatres Corporation v. McDermott

187 So. 460, 237 Ala. 489, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 213
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedFebruary 23, 1939
Docket1 Div. 43.
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 187 So. 460 (Saenger Theatres Corporation v. McDermott) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saenger Theatres Corporation v. McDermott, 187 So. 460, 237 Ala. 489, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 213 (Ala. 1939).

Opinion

BROWN, Justice.

The bill, filed by appellant, seeks relief under the' Declaratory Judgment Act. General Acts 1935, p. 777.

The averments of the bill, designed to show a justiciable controversy, are embodied in paragraphs 7 and 8, which are here reproduced:

“Complainant further avers that on, to-wit, June 22, 1938, William V. McDermott obtained a judgment in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, against Theatre Company, a corporation, for $7,-500.00. Complainant is informed and believes and on such information and belief represents that said judgment was obtained without defense by the defendant and by fraud or collusion between the parties or by confession of the debtor. Clara Mc-Dermott obtained a judgment against Theatre Company, a corporation, in the Circuit Court of Mobile County, Alabama, on May 20, 1938, for $35,867.69 and said Complainant is informed and believes and upon such information and belief represents that said judgment was obtained without • defense by the defendant and by fraud or collusion between the parties or by confession of the debtor.
“Complainant is informed and believes and upon such information and belief avers that it is the- purpose of each or both of said Respondents to insist that each or both of them .have the right to redeem said property from said foreclosure sale hereinabove set forth but .neither of them has ever tendered or offered to *490 pay to this Complainant any sum of money for the purpose of such redemption nor has either of them brought suit to redeem said property from said foreclosure sale and Complainant is advised by counsel and so charges that under the laws of Alabama as they now exist neither of said Respondents has any right to redeem said property from said foreclosure sale.”

These averments clearly do not show such controversy. At most they merely show that complainants anticipate that such controversy may arise. This is not sufficient to invite a judicial declaration of right. Theater Company v. Manning et al., 236 Ala. 670, 185 So. 171; Jefferson County v. Johnson, 232 Ala. 406, 168 So. 450.

The decree of the Circuit Court sustaining the demurrer of the defendants is free from error, and is affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BMJA, LLC v. Murphy
41 So. 3d 751 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2010)
Bedsole v. Goodloe
912 So. 2d 508 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)
Luken v. BancBoston Mortg. Corp.
580 So. 2d 578 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1991)
Smith v. Alabama Dry Dock & Shipbuilding Co.
309 So. 2d 424 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1975)
Sparks v. Brock & Blevins, Inc.
145 So. 2d 844 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1962)
American Federation of State, County & Municipal Employees v. Dawkins
104 So. 2d 827 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Jones v. Crawford
62 So. 2d 221 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Callen v. Callen
58 So. 2d 462 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1952)
Mitchell v. Hammond
39 So. 2d 582 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)
Shadix v. City of Birimingham
38 So. 2d 851 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 So. 460, 237 Ala. 489, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 213, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saenger-theatres-corporation-v-mcdermott-ala-1939.