Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean
310 U.S. 613, 60 S. Ct. 1089
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a properly presented substantial federal question. (1) [614] Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal, 251 U. S. 179; Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 261 U. S. 114, 117; Herndon v. Georgia, 295 U. S. 441, 443. (2) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32; Leffingwell v. Warren, 2 Black 599, 603; Great Northern Ry. Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co., 287 U. S. 358, 362.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean, 310 U.S. 613, 60 S. Ct. 1089 (1940).
310 U.S. 613 (Saenger Realty Corp. v. Grosjean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Leffingwell v. Warren
67 U.S. 599 (Supreme Court, 1862)
Godchaux Co. v. Estopinal
251 U.S. 179 (Supreme Court, 1919)
Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.
261 U.S. 114 (Supreme Court, 1923)
Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
265 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1924)
Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.
287 U.S. 358 (Supreme Court, 1932)
Herndon v. Georgia
295 U.S. 441 (Supreme Court, 1935)