Saeco Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Globe Motorists Supply Co.
This text of 90 A.D.2d 484 (Saeco Automotive Warehouse, Inc. v. Globe Motorists Supply Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover moneys due for goods sold and delivered, defendant Globe Motorists Supply Co., Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), entered December 1,1981, which is in favor of plaintiff and against it, inter alia, in the amount of $14,730.24, upon an order of the same court, entered October 5,1981, which granted plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment. Judgment reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, order vacated and plaintiff’s motion is denied. The letter of May 21,1981, upon which the award of partial summary judgment is based, conditioned the payment of the sum admitted on the acceptance of returns and the issuance of credits, which are the very issues upon which the parties are unable to agree. Hence, there is not an unqualified admission of a precise sum due (see Fleder v Itkin, 294 NY 77). Titone, J. P., Weinstein, Gulotta and Niehoff, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
90 A.D.2d 484, 454 N.Y.S.2d 551, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18495, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saeco-automotive-warehouse-inc-v-globe-motorists-supply-co-nyappdiv-1982.