Saechao Tada v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Oregon·Decided August 2, 2022·No. 3:20-cv-02091·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON

DAISY V.S.T. Civil No. 3:20-cv-02091-CL □ Plaintiff, . ORDER TO PAY VS., EAJA FEES os COMISSIONER SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.

CLARKE, Judge:

Following my review of Plaintiffs Motion and supporting documentation, and after consideration of Defendant’s response, and pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, $ 12,998.42 is awarded to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, and the check for EAJA fees shall be made payable to Nancy J. Meserow, based upon Plaintiff's assignment of these amounts to Plaintiff's attorney Nancy J. Meserow, subject to the satisfaction of Plaintiff's debts, if any, under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521 (2010); and in addition, Plaintiff is awarded $10.00 for postage expenses, so that the total amount awarded equals $13,008.42. Any check issued for EAJA fees or for expenses shall be sent to Plaintiff in care of her attorney, Nancy J. Meserow, at her. office, located at the following address: ~ Law Office of Nancy J. Meserow 7540 SW 51 Ave. Portland, OR 97219. ORDER to pay EAJA fees- 3:20-cv-02091-CL Page 1

_ IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated this day pK exist, 2022 A Lo , ae □

MARK D. CLARKE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE ;

ORDER to pay EAJA fees-3:20-cv-02091-CL Page2

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saechao Tada v. Commissioner Social Security Administration, (D. Or. 2022).

Saechao Tada v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Saechao Tada v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Astrue v. Ratliff
560 U.S. 586 (Supreme Court, 2010)