Sady v. Murphy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sady v. Murphy

175 A.D.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedAugust 21, 1991

StatusPublished

This text of 175 A.D.2d 895 (Sady v. Murphy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sady v. Murphy, 175 A.D.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating J. Emmett Murphy as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election, Democratic Party primary election, and Conservative Party primary election, to be held on September 12, 1991, for the nomination of those parties as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the County Court of the County of Westchester, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated August 13,1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioners failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant invalidating the petitions designating the respondent-respondent Murphy. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a proceeding to invalidate petitions designating J. Emmett Murphy as a candidate in the Republican Party primary election, Democratic Party primary election, and Conservative Party primary election, to be held on September 12, 1991, for the nomination of those parties as its candidate for the public office of Judge of the County Court of the County of Westchester, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Gurahian, J.), dated August 13,1991, which dismissed the proceeding.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioners failed to adduce evidence sufficient to warrant invalidating the petitions designating the respondent-respondent Murphy. Mangano, P. J., Thompson, Sullivan and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 A.D.2d 895, 573 N.Y.S.2d 626, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sady-v-murphy-nyappdiv-1991.