Sadur & Pelland v. Sandleitner
This text of 515 A.2d 476 (Sadur & Pelland v. Sandleitner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sadur and Pelland, Chartered, plaintiff, a Washington, D.C. law firm on September 1, 1983, sued Dennis Tile Sales, Incorporated (the Company), a Maryland close corporation, and its officers, Dennis Sandleitner (Dennis) and his wife, Caroline Sandleitner (Caroline), for nonpayment of fees for legal services rendered on behalf of the Company. The Company’s charter had been forfeited on October 3, 1980, and revived on January 20, 1984. On the latter date the Company voluntarily filed in bankruptcy and the instant proceedings against it were automatically stayed.
The circuit court entered judgments against Dennis and Caroline; Caroline appealed; and the Court of Special Appeals reversed. Sandleitner v. Sadur & Pelland, Chartered, 66 Md.App. 428, 504 A.2d 672 (1986). We granted certiorari, but order dismissal of the appeal for lack of a final judgment. MD.R. 2-602; Starfish Condominium Association v. Yorkridge Service Corp., 292 Md. 557, 440 A.2d 373 (1982).
On remand the parties and trial court may wish to consider, even before reaching the issue of the effect of charter revival on debts incurred during the period of forfeiture, (1) the ownership of the Company, (2) whether Caroline is a party to the contract sued upon, and (3) the legal effect, if any, of the plaintiff’s obtaining, or attempting to obtain, a guarantee from Dennis alone while the plaintiff had knowledge of the forfeiture.
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT OF SPECIAL APPEALS VACATED, AND CASE REMANDED TO THAT COURT [524]*524WITH DIRECTIONS TO DISMISS THE APPEAL. COSTS TO ABIDE RESULT.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
515 A.2d 476, 307 Md. 522, 1986 Md. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadur-pelland-v-sandleitner-md-1986.