SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
This text of SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D20-94
[March 19, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 56-2011-CF-002387A, 56-2012-CF-000726A, and 56-2012-CF-000928A.
Sadrick Rashada Williams, Malone, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed.
GROSS, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadrick-rashada-williams-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2020.