SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2020·No. 20-0094·Published

Opinion

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT

SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS, Appellant,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Appellee.

No. 4D20-94

[March 19, 2020]

Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 56-2011-CF-002387A, 56-2012-CF-000726A, and 56-2012-CF-000928A.

Sadrick Rashada Williams, Malone, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. GROSS, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.

* * *

Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA, (Fla. Ct. App. 2020).

SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.