SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
No. 4D20-94
[March 19, 2020]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie County; Charles A. Schwab, Judge; L.T. Case Nos. 56-2011-CF-002387A, 56-2012-CF-000726A, and 56-2012-CF-000928A.
Sadrick Rashada Williams, Malone, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee. PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. GROSS, GERBER and KUNTZ, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA (SADRICK RASHADA WILLIAMS v. STATE OF FLORIDA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.