Sadowsky v. Levine

Supreme Court of Florida

Sadowsky v. Levine

151 So. 2d 2

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 13, 1963·No. No. 31757·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Sadowsky v. Levine, 151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963).

Pincite

151 So. 2d 2 (Sadowsky v. Levine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related