Sadowsky v. Levine

151 So. 2d 2
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1963
DocketNo. 31757
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 151 So. 2d 2 (Sadowsky v. Levine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sadowsky v. Levine, 151 So. 2d 2 (Fla. 1963).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of certiorari reflected apparent jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter we have determined that the petition is without merit. Therefore, the writ must be and is hereby discharged, 135 So.2d 776.

It is so ordered.

TERRELL, Acting C. J., THOMAS, CALDWELL, HOBSON (Ret.), JJ., and SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. DREW and O’CONNELL, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Haynes v. Lloyd
533 So. 2d 944 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
151 So. 2d 2, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadowsky-v-levine-fla-1963.