Sadowski v. Feinberg
131 F. App'x 776
Opinion
SUMMARY ORDER
Appellant, Joseph A.F. Sadowski, pro se and in forma pauperis, appeals from the sua sponte dismissal by the United States District Court (Hurley, J.), of his complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985.
The parties’ familiarity with the facts is assumed. We affirm the judgment of the district court, for substantially the reasons given by the district court in its analysis. See, Order, Sadowski v. Riordan, et al., No. 04-Cv-1680 (DRH), (E.D.N.Y. July 20, 2004).
The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sadowski v. Feinberg, 131 F. App'x 776 (2d Cir. 2005).
131 F. App'x 776 (Sadowski v. Feinberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Civil action for deprivation of rights
42 U.S.C. § 1983
§ 1985
42 U.S.C. § 1985