Sadowski v. Dutchess Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sadowski v. Dutchess Manufacturing Co.

18 A.D.2d 841, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 28, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 18 A.D.2d 841 (Sadowski v. Dutchess Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sadowski v. Dutchess Manufacturing Co., 18 A.D.2d 841, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by the female plaintiff, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 14,1961, and thereafter entered in Dutchess County, as conditionally granted its motion to dismiss the action by reason of plaintiffs’ failure to serve a complaint and to diligently prosecute the action; the condition being the plaintiffs’ failure to serve a complaint, to complete pretrial proceedings and to notice the case for trial within 60 days. The appeal relates only to the imposition of such conditions; defendant contends that its motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a negligence action to recover damages for personal injury sustained by the female plaintiff, the defendant appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, dated July 14,1961, and thereafter entered in Dutchess County, as conditionally granted its motion to dismiss the action by reason of plaintiffs’ failure to serve a complaint and to diligently prosecute the action; the condition being the plaintiffs’ failure to serve a complaint, to complete pretrial proceedings and to notice the case for trial within 60 days. The appeal relates only to the imposition of such conditions; defendant contends that its motion to dismiss should have been granted unconditionally. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Beldock, P. J., Kleinfeld, Brennan, Hill and Rabin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

18 A.D.2d 841, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadowski-v-dutchess-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1963.