Sadler v. Trisan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sadler v. Trisan

20 A.D.2d 857, 248 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 2, 1964

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 A.D.2d 857 (Sadler v. Trisan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sadler v. Trisan, 20 A.D.2d 857, 248 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1964).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $2,089.18 for fraudulently obtaining and executing a final order awarding possession of residential premises to defendant landlord in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent and for wrongful deprivation of plaintiff tenant’s possession of said premises, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to defendant-appellant, and the complaint dismissed. The alleged fraud is intrinsic rather than extrinsic. Plaintiff may not collaterally attack the final order of the Municipal Court. (David v. Faymam, 273 App. Div. 408, affd. 298 N. Y. 669; Grouse v. MeVickar, 207 N. Y. 213.) The Municipal Court had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter and the issue as to the nonpayment of rent was there directly involved and determined; its final order, although rendered on plaintiff’s default, is conclusive. (Grouse v. MeVickar, supra, p. 217.) Concur — McNally, J. P., Eager, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment awarding plaintiff damages in the sum of $2,089.18 for fraudulently obtaining and executing a final order awarding possession of residential premises to defendant landlord in a summary proceeding for nonpayment of rent and for wrongful deprivation of plaintiff tenant’s possession of said premises, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts, with costs to defendant-appellant, and the complaint dismissed. The alleged fraud is intrinsic rather than extrinsic. Plaintiff may not collaterally attack the final order of the Municipal Court. (David v. Faymam, 273 App. Div. 408, affd. 298 N. Y. 669; Grouse v. MeVickar, 207 N. Y. 213.) The Municipal Court had jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter and the issue as to the nonpayment of rent was there directly involved and determined; its final order, although rendered on plaintiff’s default, is conclusive. (Grouse v. MeVickar, supra, p. 217.) Concur — McNally, J. P., Eager, Steuer and Witmer, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 A.D.2d 857, 248 N.Y.S.2d 163, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4102, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadler-v-trisan-nyappdiv-1964.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack