Sadler v. State

72 S.W.2d 285
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sadler v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 118 Tex. Crim. 318
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided June 6, 1934·No. No. 16901·Published

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful manufacture of intoxicating liquor; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appellant Charlie Sadler and Will Spearman were jointly indicted for the offense. It seems that both Sadler and Spear-man sought a severance. ' The court granted the severance and Sadler was tried first.

The evidence heard upon the trial is not brought before this court for review.

A suspended sentence was sought and properly submitted in the charge of the court. The jury declined to accord the suspended sentence.

In the absence of the facts, this court is not in a position to pass upon the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

Perceiving no error, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sadler v. State, 72 S.W.2d 285 (Tex. 1934).

72 S.W.2d 285 (Sadler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.