Sadler v. State

123 So. 294, 23 Ala. App. 269, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 212
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided June 29, 1929·No. 8 Div. 815.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for violating the prohibition law. The prosecution was commenced by affidavit to which the defendant interposed demurrer upon the ground that certain alternative averments therein failed to charge a substantive offense. The defect pointed out by demurrer was cured by an amendment to the affidavit eliminating the defective alternative averments. This, as applied to affidavits or complaints, is permissible under the law. Section 4646, Code 1923. No other question is presented.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sadler v. State, 123 So. 294, 23 Ala. App. 269, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 212 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

123 So. 294 (Sadler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.