Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service
This text of 43 F. App'x 701 (Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In these consolidated petitions for review, Afrah Sadiq seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) orders: (1) denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings (No. 98-1928); and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of her first motion to reopen and denying her second motion to reopen (No. 02-1306). We have reviewed the administrative records and the Board’s decisions and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying these motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny both petitions for review on the reasoning of the Board. See Sadiq v. INS, No. A72-418-396 (B.I.A. May 28, 1998 & Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
PETITIONS DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
43 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadiq-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2002.