Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service

43 F. App'x 701
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 30, 2002
DocketNos. 98-1928, 02-1306
StatusPublished

This text of 43 F. App'x 701 (Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sadiq v. U.S. Immigration & Naturalization Service, 43 F. App'x 701 (4th Cir. 2002).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

In these consolidated petitions for review, Afrah Sadiq seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“Board”) orders: (1) denying her motion to reopen deportation proceedings (No. 98-1928); and (2) denying her motion for reconsideration of the denial of her first motion to reopen and denying her second motion to reopen (No. 02-1306). We have reviewed the administrative records and the Board’s decisions and find that the Board did not abuse its discretion in denying these motions. See 8 C.F.R. § 3.2(a) (2002); INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314, 323-24, 112 S.Ct. 719, 116 L.Ed.2d 823 (1992). Accordingly, we deny both petitions for review on the reasoning of the Board. See Sadiq v. INS, No. A72-418-396 (B.I.A. May 28, 1998 & Feb. 20, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

PETITIONS DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Doherty
502 U.S. 314 (Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 F. App'x 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadiq-v-us-immigration-naturalization-service-ca4-2002.