Sadie Rayne Williams v. State
This text of Sadie Rayne Williams v. State (Sadie Rayne Williams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NO. 07-04-0275-CR
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS
AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
JULY 7, 2004
______________________________
SADIE RAYNE WILLIAMS, APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE
_________________________________
FROM THE COUNTY COURT AT LAW NO. 2 OF POTTER COUNTY;
NO. 105,893; HONORABLE PAMELA COOK SIRMON, JUDGE
_______________________________
Before JOHNSON, C.J., and REAVIS and CAMPBELL, JJ.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
After appellant Sadie Rayne Williams filed a notice of appeal challenging her conviction, on June 2, 2004, the trial court signed an order granting her motion for new trial. Pending before this Court is appellant’s motion to dismiss her appeal which is accompanied by a certified copy of the trial court’s order. We grant the motion.
The granting of a motion for new trial in a criminal case is governed by Rule 21.9 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. The legal effect of granting the motion restores the case to its position before the former trial. See State v. Bates, 889 S.W.2d 306, 310 (Tex.Cr.App. 1994); see also Waller v. State 931 S.W.2d 640, 643 (Tex.App.–Dallas 1996, no pet.).
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed and the Clerk of this Court is directed to issue mandate.
Don H. Reavis
Justice
Do not publish.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sadie Rayne Williams v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sadie-rayne-williams-v-state-texapp-2004.