Sadhvani v. Chertoff

D.C. Circuit

Sadhvani v. Chertoff

279 F. App'x 9

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided May 13, 2008·No. No. 06-5405·Published

Opinion

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j).

For the reasons well stated by the district court, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en bane. See Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs filed by the parties. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j).

For the reasons well stated by the district court, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the judgment of the district court be affirmed.

Pursuant to Rule 36 of this Court, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after the disposition of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en bane. See Fed R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. R. 41.

Sadhvani v. Chertoff, 279 F. App'x 9 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pincite

279 F. App'x 9 (Sadhvani v. Chertoff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.