Saddler v. State

97 S.E. 79, 148 Ga. 462, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 370
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 15, 1918·No. No. 805·Published

Opinion

Fish, O. J.

That part of the “prohibition law” contained in the act of WV (Acts 1917, Ex. Sess., p. 7, sec. 1) which declares it to be a misdemeanor for one to have, control, or possess any alcoholic, spirituous, malt, or intoxicating liquors, or other liquors which if drunk to excess will produce intoxication, is not violative of any of the constitutional provisions set forth in the demurrer to the accusation in this case; and the judgment overruling the demurrer is sustained. Cureton v. State, 135 Ga. 660 (70 S. E. 332, 49 L. R. A. (N. S.) 182); Delaney v. Plunkett, 146 Ga. 547, 550 (91 S. E. 561, L. R. A. 1917D, 926, Ann. Cas. 1917E, 685); Barbour v. State, 146 Ga. 667, 668 (92 S. E. 70); Jackson v. State, ante, 351 (96 S. E. 1001).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. J. M. Austin, for plaintiff in error. H. J. MacIntyre, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saddler v. State, 97 S.E. 79, 148 Ga. 462, 1918 Ga. LEXIS 370 (Ga. 1918).

97 S.E. 79 (Saddler v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cureton v. State
70 S.E. 332 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Delaney v. Plunkett
91 S.E. 561 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Barbour v. State
92 S.E. 70 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1917)
Jackson v. State
96 S.E. 1001 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1918)