Saddler v. People

58 N.E. 906, 188 Ill. 243, 1900 Ill. LEXIS 2457
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 20, 1900
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 58 N.E. 906 (Saddler v. People) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saddler v. People, 58 N.E. 906, 188 Ill. 243, 1900 Ill. LEXIS 2457 (Ill. 1900).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Plaintiffs in error, being engaged in general merchandising, as proprietors, selling groceries, principally, in the city of Kankakee, are charged with a violation of section 2 of the Pharmacy act as amended by the act of 1895, (Laws of 1895, p. 245,) by selling a number of bottles of a certain patent or proprietary medicine known as “Castoria,” neither of said proprietors being a registered pharmacist nor having a registered pharmacist in their employ, nor having obtained a permit to sell proprietary medicines from the State Board of Pharmacy, as provided in section 8 of said act. The prosecution was brought before a justice of the peace by summons, where a fine was imposed, whereupon plaintiffs in error prosecuted an appeal to the circuit court of Kankakee county, where they were again found guilty and a judgment entered for $20 and costs, to reverse which they prosecute this writ of error.

The questions involved in this case are the same as those in, and a determination thereof is controlled by, the case of Noel v. People, 187 Ill. 587. The judgment of the circuit court of Kankakee county is therefore reversed and the cause remanded.

M and remaM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Osco Drug, Inc. v. Department of Registration & Education
370 N.E.2d 59 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
58 N.E. 906, 188 Ill. 243, 1900 Ill. LEXIS 2457, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saddler-v-people-ill-1900.