Saddlebrook Inv. v. Krohne
Opinion
CIGINAL 05/30/2023
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA Case Number: DA 23-0281
DA 23-0281
SADDLEBROOK INVESTMENTS, LLC, FILED as Assignee of STUART M. SIMONSEN, MAY 3 0 2023 Bowen Gr-, enwooa Plaintiff and Appellee. Clerk of Str-rerr. Coun State Of Montanp
v. ORDER KROHNE FUND. L.P., SEAN WRIGHT,
Defendants,
ANTHONY BIRBILIS,
Defendant and Appellant.
This rnatter comes before the Court on Defendant and Appellant Anthony Birbilis's notice of appeal from the Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Cause No. DV 15-0391. Birbilis asserts that this appeal is taken frorn an order certi fied as final by the District Court pursuant to M. R. Civ. P. 54(b). Under Rule 54(b)(1), when an action presents more than one claim for relief or when multiple parties are involved, the court may direct entry of a final judgment as to one or more, but fewer than all, claims or parties only ifthe court expressly determines that there is no just reason for delay. In the present case, the District Court has not certified any orders under Rule 54(b), but our review of the record indicates that such certification is unnecessary. Birbilis appealed after the District Court made dispositive rulings on all matters and entered final judgment. This matter is appealable pursuant to M. R. App. P. 6(1). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this appeal may proceed. The Clerk is directed to provide copies of this Order to all parties and counsel of record. DATED thiA8 day of May, 2023.
Chief Justice
oloif? ? ..--4Justices
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Saddlebrook Inv. v. Krohne (Saddlebrook Inv. v. Krohne) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.