Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River

150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided April 7, 1959·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

29 N.J. 468 (1959)
150 A.2d 34

THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 16, 1959.
Decided April 7, 1959.

Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR — 5.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River, 150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468 (N.J. 1959).

150 A.2d 34 (Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Hilton Acres v. Klein
174 A.2d 465 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)