Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River

150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedApril 7, 1959
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 150 A.2d 34 (Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River, 150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468 (N.J. 1959).

Opinion

29 N.J. 468 (1959)
150 A.2d 34

THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Argued March 16, 1959.
Decided April 7, 1959.

Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).

Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR — 5.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
Hilton Acres v. Klein
174 A.2d 465 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1961)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saddle-river-country-day-sch-v-borough-of-saddle-river-nj-1959.