Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River
This text of 150 A.2d 34 (Saddle River Country Day Sch. v. Borough of Saddle River) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,
v.
THE BOROUGH OF SADDLE RIVER, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
WILLIAM C. WOLLEN, ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
THE SADDLE RIVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL AND CHESTNUT RIDGE LAND CO., INC., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mr. Fred G. Stickel, III and Mr. John J. Breslin, Jr. argued the cause for the appellants (Messrs. Breslin & Breslin, attorneys for William C. Wollen et als.; Messrs. Stickel & Stickel, attorneys for Borough of Saddle River).
Mr. James A. Major argued the cause for the respondents.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion of Judge Hall in the court below.
For affirmance Chief Justice WEINTRAUB, and Justices BURLING, JACOBS, FRANCIS and PROCTOR 5.
For reversal None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
150 A.2d 34, 29 N.J. 468, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saddle-river-country-day-sch-v-borough-of-saddle-river-nj-1959.