Saddle Brook Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Northeast Hotel Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Saddle Brook Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Northeast Hotel Corp.

299 A.D.2d 226, 749 N.Y.S.2d 412, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11198

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 19, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.D.2d 226 (Saddle Brook Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Northeast Hotel Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saddle Brook Garden Restaurant, Inc. v. Northeast Hotel Corp., 299 A.D.2d 226, 749 N.Y.S.2d 412, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11198 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered July 12, 2001, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Litigation in this action of plaintiffs causes against defendants-respondents, alleging constructive and actual eviction, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, since the causes plaintiff would now litigate arise out of transactions that were the subject of litigation finally concluded against plaintiff in the courts of New Jersey (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Helen Freedman, J.), entered July 12, 2001, which granted defendants-respondents’ motion to dismiss the complaint as barred by the doctrine of res judicata, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Litigation in this action of plaintiffs causes against defendants-respondents, alleging constructive and actual eviction, is barred by the doctrine of res judicata, since the causes plaintiff would now litigate arise out of transactions that were the subject of litigation finally concluded against plaintiff in the courts of New Jersey (see O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357). Concur — Williams, P.J., Nardelli, Rosenberger, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.D.2d 226, 749 N.Y.S.2d 412, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saddle-brook-garden-restaurant-inc-v-northeast-hotel-corp-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack