UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MOHAMMED SADAT, M.D., Plaintiff, –v. – No. 19-cv-5053 (JMF) STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, et. al., Defendants. CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, discovery (including without limitation, interrogatories, document productions and depositions) and other proceedings in Sadat v. State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Mantosh Dewan, M.D., F. Sebastian Thomsa, M.D., and Carlos J. Lopez, M.D.,1 No. 19-CV-5053 (SDNY) (JMF) (the “Litigation”), may involve the production or disclosure of Confidential or Highly Confidential Material (as defined herein); WHEREAS the Plaintiff and Defendants (“the Parties”) agree that a protective order is necessary to assure appropriate protection of privacy interests and other legitimate interests in confidentiality;
WHEREAS the Parties agree to the terms of this Order (“Protective Order”) to protect their confidential documents, things, and information; WHEREAS this Protective Order does not operate to mandate disclosure of any particular information and does not work to waive any objections any Party may have to the production of any particular information in response to a demand in this litigation; and WHEREAS good cause exists for the entry of this Protective Order,
1 As a subdivision of The State University of New York (“SUNY”), the Downstate Medical Center is not a legally cognizable entity separate from SUNY. See N.Y. Educ. Law §§ 351 and 352; Daniel v. American Bd. Of Emergency Medicine, 988 F. Supp. 127, 175 (W.D.N.Y. 1997). Therefore, SUNY is the sole proper institutional defendant. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), it is hereby stipulated and agreed that: 1. This Protective Order shall govern the handling of all information and/or materials produced or disclosed during the course of the Litigation, by any Party or Non-Party, including but not limited to information produced or disclosed: a. in any pleading, document, affidavit, affirmation, interrogatory answer, responses to requests for admission, brief, motion, transcript, or any other written, electronic, recorded or graphic material; b. in testimony given in a deposition, court hearing, or trial, and any copies, or summaries of such information; or c. through any manner or means of discovery, including entry onto land or premises and inspection of books, records, documents and tangible things. 2. As used herein, the term “Discovery Material” refers to that information and/or materials described in 1(a)-(c) above. A Party that designates Discovery Material as Confidential (“Confidential Material”) or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (Highly Confidential Material”) is the “Designating Party.” 3. As used herein, the term “the Litigation” refers to all proceedings in the above- captioned case, including any appeals and the implementation of any remedy agreed to by the Parties or ordered by the Court. 4. The following documents and information produced or provided by the Parties or Non-Parties during the course of this Litigation, except information which is publicly available, may be designated by any Party as Highly Confidential or Confidential: a. Documents and Information that may be designated by any Party as Highly Confidential Material: i. all documents and information relating to the employment, residency, or employment or residency application of any current, former, or prospective employees or residents of SUNY, including but not limited to reviews, evaluations, and application and personnel files; ii. all documents and information related to SUNY’s practices and procedures concerning hiring and the resident selection process, or SUNY’s confidential trade secrets or proprietary information; and iii. testimony about the documents and information covered by Paragraph 4(a) (i)-(ii). b. Documents and Information that may be designated by any Party as Confidential Material: i. all documents and information that relate to complaints or grievances by or about or investigations or reports of any office, person or agency about any employee, resident, or former employee or resident of SUNY;
ii. all documents and information containing personal health or disability information of any Party hereto, including but not limited to documents and information covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and records disclosed by a Party pursuant to any Authorization to Release Medical Records executed by the Plaintiff in this Litigation; iii. all documents and information containing mental health or psychiatric information of any Party hereto, including but not limited to documents and information covered by HIPAA and records disclosed by a Party pursuant to any Authorization to Release Psychotherapy Notes executed by the Plaintiff in this Litigation; iv. all documents and information relating to the private, personal, and non-public information of Non-Parties to the Litigation; v. all documents and information that SUNY believes would compromise the safety or security of any employee or facility if disclosed; and vi. any documents and information which counsel for all Parties agree should be Confidential Material, subject to the provisions of paragraph 16 below; vii. any other documents and/or information which counsel believes in good faith to be Confidential Material that can be protected from disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c); viii. any Discovery Materials that the Court directs to be produced as Confidential subject to this Order; and ix. testimony about the documents and information covered by Paragraph 4(b) (i)-(viii). 5. Any summary, compilation, notes, copy, electronic images, or database containing Material and/or information designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” shall be subject to the terms of this Protective Order to the same extent as the Material or information from which such summary, compilation, notes, electronic image, or database is made or derived. 6. Any Party producing Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material described in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Protective Order (“the Producing Party”) may designate such Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential. To designate the Discovery Materials as Confidential, the Producing Party shall mark the document with the words
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or with a similar legend. To designate the Discovery Materials as Highly Confidential, the Producing Party shall mark the document with the words “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or with a similar legend. Where such marking of each piece of such Material is impossible or impractical (such as productions of groups of documents in native form), the Producing Party shall designate in writing that information or Material it regards as containing Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material at the time of its production. In the case of any Discovery Material that is in the form of an audio or video recording (whether analog or digital) that cannot be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” in a practicable and
cost-efficient manner, it shall be sufficient for the Producing Party to clearly mark the CD-ROM, DVD, or other physical medium containing such electronic data or documents with the appropriate designation.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MOHAMMED SADAT, M.D., Plaintiff, –v. – No. 19-cv-5053 (JMF) STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, et. al., Defendants. CONFIDENTIALITY STIPULATION AND PROTECTIVE ORDER WHEREAS, discovery (including without limitation, interrogatories, document productions and depositions) and other proceedings in Sadat v. State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Mantosh Dewan, M.D., F. Sebastian Thomsa, M.D., and Carlos J. Lopez, M.D.,1 No. 19-CV-5053 (SDNY) (JMF) (the “Litigation”), may involve the production or disclosure of Confidential or Highly Confidential Material (as defined herein); WHEREAS the Plaintiff and Defendants (“the Parties”) agree that a protective order is necessary to assure appropriate protection of privacy interests and other legitimate interests in confidentiality;
WHEREAS the Parties agree to the terms of this Order (“Protective Order”) to protect their confidential documents, things, and information; WHEREAS this Protective Order does not operate to mandate disclosure of any particular information and does not work to waive any objections any Party may have to the production of any particular information in response to a demand in this litigation; and WHEREAS good cause exists for the entry of this Protective Order,
1 As a subdivision of The State University of New York (“SUNY”), the Downstate Medical Center is not a legally cognizable entity separate from SUNY. See N.Y. Educ. Law §§ 351 and 352; Daniel v. American Bd. Of Emergency Medicine, 988 F. Supp. 127, 175 (W.D.N.Y. 1997). Therefore, SUNY is the sole proper institutional defendant. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), it is hereby stipulated and agreed that: 1. This Protective Order shall govern the handling of all information and/or materials produced or disclosed during the course of the Litigation, by any Party or Non-Party, including but not limited to information produced or disclosed: a. in any pleading, document, affidavit, affirmation, interrogatory answer, responses to requests for admission, brief, motion, transcript, or any other written, electronic, recorded or graphic material; b. in testimony given in a deposition, court hearing, or trial, and any copies, or summaries of such information; or c. through any manner or means of discovery, including entry onto land or premises and inspection of books, records, documents and tangible things. 2. As used herein, the term “Discovery Material” refers to that information and/or materials described in 1(a)-(c) above. A Party that designates Discovery Material as Confidential (“Confidential Material”) or “Highly Confidential – Attorneys’ Eyes Only” (Highly Confidential Material”) is the “Designating Party.” 3. As used herein, the term “the Litigation” refers to all proceedings in the above- captioned case, including any appeals and the implementation of any remedy agreed to by the Parties or ordered by the Court. 4. The following documents and information produced or provided by the Parties or Non-Parties during the course of this Litigation, except information which is publicly available, may be designated by any Party as Highly Confidential or Confidential: a. Documents and Information that may be designated by any Party as Highly Confidential Material: i. all documents and information relating to the employment, residency, or employment or residency application of any current, former, or prospective employees or residents of SUNY, including but not limited to reviews, evaluations, and application and personnel files; ii. all documents and information related to SUNY’s practices and procedures concerning hiring and the resident selection process, or SUNY’s confidential trade secrets or proprietary information; and iii. testimony about the documents and information covered by Paragraph 4(a) (i)-(ii). b. Documents and Information that may be designated by any Party as Confidential Material: i. all documents and information that relate to complaints or grievances by or about or investigations or reports of any office, person or agency about any employee, resident, or former employee or resident of SUNY;
ii. all documents and information containing personal health or disability information of any Party hereto, including but not limited to documents and information covered by the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”) and records disclosed by a Party pursuant to any Authorization to Release Medical Records executed by the Plaintiff in this Litigation; iii. all documents and information containing mental health or psychiatric information of any Party hereto, including but not limited to documents and information covered by HIPAA and records disclosed by a Party pursuant to any Authorization to Release Psychotherapy Notes executed by the Plaintiff in this Litigation; iv. all documents and information relating to the private, personal, and non-public information of Non-Parties to the Litigation; v. all documents and information that SUNY believes would compromise the safety or security of any employee or facility if disclosed; and vi. any documents and information which counsel for all Parties agree should be Confidential Material, subject to the provisions of paragraph 16 below; vii. any other documents and/or information which counsel believes in good faith to be Confidential Material that can be protected from disclosure pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c); viii. any Discovery Materials that the Court directs to be produced as Confidential subject to this Order; and ix. testimony about the documents and information covered by Paragraph 4(b) (i)-(viii). 5. Any summary, compilation, notes, copy, electronic images, or database containing Material and/or information designated as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” shall be subject to the terms of this Protective Order to the same extent as the Material or information from which such summary, compilation, notes, electronic image, or database is made or derived. 6. Any Party producing Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material described in paragraphs 4 and 5 of this Protective Order (“the Producing Party”) may designate such Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential. To designate the Discovery Materials as Confidential, the Producing Party shall mark the document with the words
“CONFIDENTIAL,” “CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or with a similar legend. To designate the Discovery Materials as Highly Confidential, the Producing Party shall mark the document with the words “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – ATTORNEY EYES ONLY,” “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL – SUBJECT TO PROTECTIVE ORDER,” or with a similar legend. Where such marking of each piece of such Material is impossible or impractical (such as productions of groups of documents in native form), the Producing Party shall designate in writing that information or Material it regards as containing Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material at the time of its production. In the case of any Discovery Material that is in the form of an audio or video recording (whether analog or digital) that cannot be designated “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” in a practicable and
cost-efficient manner, it shall be sufficient for the Producing Party to clearly mark the CD-ROM, DVD, or other physical medium containing such electronic data or documents with the appropriate designation. So-marked documents and the information contained therein, shall not be disclosed to anyone by the Party receiving the Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material (“the Receiving Party”), except as provided in this Protective Order. The designation of Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential constitutes a representation by the Producing Party that counsel has adequately reviewed the Discovery Material and has determined that there is good cause for the designation under Paragraphs 4 or 5 of this Protective Order.
7. Unless otherwise ordered by the Court or agreed to by the Parties in writing, Confidential Material and Highly Confidential Material: a. shall be used by the Receiving Party solely for the purpose of, or in investigation and preparation for, proceedings, hearings, depositions, motions, and trial in this Litigation, and not for any other purpose, including in any other actions or claims interposed by the Plaintiff or any other person against the Defendant. b. Confidential Material may be disclosed by the Receiving Party only to: i. The Parties; ii. counsel representing the Parties, including in-house counsel, employees of counsel or counsel’s office, persons acting under counsel’s supervision, and employees and independent contractors of counsel who are directly involved in preparation or litigation of this Litigation; iii. current employees of SUNY who would normally have access to such information; iv. any expert or consultant who has been retained by any Party for purposes of the Litigation and any necessary assistants or employees under the expert’s or consultant’s direct supervision; v. for purposes of investigation, preparation, deposition, or trial in this Litigation only, any deponent, witness, or potential deponent or potential witness who authored or otherwise had or should have had access to, familiarity with, or knowledge of the facts and circumstances to which the Confidential Material relates, including but not limited to current or former employees of SUNY; vi. any other person as to whom the Parties agree in writing in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph 8 of this Protective Order; vii. court reporters, as necessary for the conduct of the Litigation; and viii. the Court and personnel employed by it. c. Highly Confidential Material may be disclosed by the Receiving Party only to: i. the author or sender of the document and, for purposes of investigation, preparation, deposition, or trial in this action only, any deponent, witness, or potential deponent or potential witness who authored or otherwise had access to and familiarity with the document or information at the time of its original creation and use prior to the Litigation; ii. counsel representing the Parties, including in-house counsel, employees of counsel or counsel’s office, persons acting under counsel’s supervision, and employees and independent contractors of counsel who are directly involved in preparation or litigation of this Litigation; iii. any expert or consultant who has been retained by any Party for purposes of the Litigation and any necessary assistants or employees under the expert’s or consultant’s direct supervision; iv. any other person as to whom the Parties agree in writing in accordance with the procedures set forth in paragraph 8 of this Protective Order; v. court reporters, as necessary for the conduct of the Litigation; and vi. the Court and personnel employed by it. 8. Prior to the disclosure of any Confidential Material by a Receiving Party to a person identified in subparagraphs 7(b)(iv), 7(b)(v) or 7(b)(vi), and prior to the disclosure of any Highly Confidential Material by a Receiving Party to a person identified in subparagraphs 7(c)(iii), or 7(c)(iv), counsel for the Party proposing to make such disclosure shall ensure that a copy of this Protective Order has been delivered to such person, and shall obtain that person’s written agreement to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order and consent to the Court’s jurisdiction for the purpose of enforcing this Protective Order in the form of the Non-Disclosure Agreement annexed hereto as Appendix A. Counsel of record shall maintain a list of the names of all persons to whom such materials or information is disclosed and such list shall be available for inspection by counsel for the Designating Party upon order of the Court following a showing of good cause. 9. All Confidential Material and Highly Confidential Material shall be maintained by the Receiving Party in a confidential manner, and shall not be given, shown, or described to any
persons other than those described in Paragraph 7, and only pursuant to the procedures in Paragraph 8. 10. A Receiving Party shall not file Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material in the record of the Litigation or with the Court, except as follows: a. A Receiving Party may file unredacted Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material in the record of this Litigation, or with the Court, upon written consent by counsel for the Producing Party. b. If a Party uses Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material in a pleading, motion, or other submission filed with the Court without the written consent of counsel for the Producing Party, the Party using the Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material shall file its submission under seal in accordance with the Court’s Local Rules and the assigned judge’s Individual Rules. c. If a Receiving Party intends to use or elicit testimony concerning Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material at trial or in open court on any occasion in a manner that will disclose the Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material, the Receiving Party intending to so use Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material shall take all steps reasonably required to protect the material’s confidentiality during such use. Nothing contained herein shall be deemed to restrict the Court’s handling of Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material or to cause a Party to be in breach of this Protective Order when acting in compliance with an order or direction of the Court. 11. Any Party, through its counsel, may designate as Confidential or Highly Confidential any deposition testimony that the Party believes in good faith discusses or discloses Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material. Such designation may be made orally on the record of a deposition or by written notice within 30 days from the receipt of the final (i.e., not “draft” or “rough”) transcript. The court reporter shall be notified of any confidentiality designations made after the final transcript is sent to the Parties. Upon receipt of a confidentiality designation, all Parties in possession of the deposition transcript shall be required to mark the designated pages accordingly on all copies of the transcript and treat those pages of the transcript appropriately. Subject to any requirements of the Court, the reporter for any deposition or hearing
shall affix a legend of “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to pages that contain testimony designated as such. All transcripts shall be treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” until the time to designate has expired. 13. In the event that any Party obtains documents or information from a Party or Non- Party that it believes are confidential, any Party may designate such documents or information as Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material pursuant to this Protective Order and it shall be treated as such in accordance with this Stipulation and Protective Order. 14. Any person making copies of Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material must ensure that the copies adequately reflect the “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” designation.
15. In the event of a disclosure to an unauthorized Party of information designated under this Protective Order as Confidential or Highly Confidential, the disclosing party shall without delay (a) notify the Designating Party of the disclosure; (b) take all reasonable steps to recover the document, material or other information, and (c) report to the Designating Party immediately upon recovery or failure to recover the Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material. 16. Inadvertent or unintentional failure to appropriately designate a document as Confidential or Highly Confidential shall not be deemed a waiver of a Party’s claim of confidentiality. Such inadvertent failure to designate may be corrected by written notice to the other Parties and a supplemental production, each given as soon as practicable. Thereafter, the disclosed document or information shall be treated as Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material. 17. A designation of Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material by one
Party shall not be deemed an acknowledgment of confidentiality by any other Party except for purposes of this Stipulation. At any time, a Party may object to a designation of Discovery Material as Confidential or Highly Confidential, in whole or in part, by communicating the objection in writing to the Designating Party and stating the reasons for the objection. Within fourteen (14) days after receiving an objection, the Designating Party shall respond in writing to the objecting Party, either withdrawing the designation or providing the reasons why the designation will not be withdrawn. If the objecting Party is not satisfied with the response, it may then move the Court for an order that the designation be removed. The Party designating the material as Confidential or Highly Confidential shall bear the burden of establishing the confidentiality of the material at issue. The Discovery Material shall continue to be treated as
Confidential or Highly Confidential while such a motion is pending. Any Party may request an in camera review of the information that is the subject of a dispute regarding a confidentiality designation. 18. Nothing in this Protective Order shall be construed to limit, modify, or interfere in any manner with: a. The disclosure obligations of SUNY under the New York Freedom of Information Law (“FOIL”), New York Public Officers Law Article 6, and related state law, regulations, and judicial decisions; b. The interpretation, application, and implementation by SUNY, its public access officers, and state courts, of FOIL and related state law, regulations, and judicial decisions as well as other laws and regulations; c. SUNY’s or any of its employees’ or officials’, use in the ordinary course of business and as permitted by law outside of this Litigation of documents and information designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential Material in this Litigation that they legally have in their possession and which were not received through discovery in this Litigation or through releases or authorizations signed by Plaintiff; d. SUNY’s or any of its employees’ or officials’, use of their own Confidential or Highly Confidential Material and/or Discovery Material; or e. Notwithstanding any provision set forth herein, any Party or Non-Party may use without restriction information that is in its possession by means other than receipt of a production pursuant to this Protective Order, except that each Party and Non-Party is bound by any applicable rule or law regarding confidential treatment of such Confidential Material, Highly Confidential Material and/or Discovery Material used in this Litigation. 19. This Protective Order does not preclude a Party from raising or preserving objections to discovery and does not waive any Party’s right to assert attorney-client privilege, attorney work product doctrine, or any other privilege or immunity as the Litigation proceeds. 20. This Protective Order does not require production of documents as to which valid objections or privileges apply. 21. Fed. R. Civ. P 26(b)(5)(B) shall govern the return and use of materials produced in discovery which are subject to a claim of privilege or of protection as trial preparation material and the determination of claims of privilege and/or protection regarding such documents. 22. The production of privileged or work-product protected documents, information, or electronically stored information (“ESI”), whether inadvertent or otherwise, is not a waiver of the privilege or protection from discovery in this case or in any other federal or state proceeding. This Order shall be interpreted to provide the maximum protection allowed by Federal Rule of Evidence 502(d). 23. If any Party is served with a subpoena or other notice in another proceeding or from a regulatory or other governmental agency requesting or compelling the production of materials produced by another Party and designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential, the Party so requested shall give immediate written notice to the Designating Party of such subpoena or other notice. Upon receipt of such notice, the Designating Party so notified shall bear the burden of opposing, if appropriate, the subpoena or other notice on grounds of confidentiality. In no event
shall production or disclosure be made before reasonable notice is given to the Designating Party. 24. Nothing in this Protective Order shall prejudice the rights of any Party to contest the alleged relevance, admissibility, or discoverability of Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material sought. 25. Nothing in this Protective Order shall negate or obviate any requirement or obligation of confidentiality independent of this Protective Order. 26. This Protective Order shall survive and remain in full force and effect after the termination of the Litigation. Neither the termination of this lawsuit nor the termination of employment of any person with access to any Confidential Material or Highly Confidential Material shall relieve such person from the obligation of maintaining the confidentiality of such
information. 27. At the request of the Producing Party, upon the final conclusion of the Litigation, including any post-trial motions, appellate proceedings, and the period for implementation of any remedy agreed to by the Parties or ordered by the Court, all matter designated as Confidential or Highly Confidential (including all copies of such documents or identifiable portions thereof and all documents reflecting the documents or their contents) shall be returned promptly by the Receiving Party to the Producing Party, or, in lieu of their return, such documents may be destroyed (as by shredding). The Receiving Party must certify in writing the return or destruction of all such documents within thirty (30) days of the Producing Party’s request for return or destruction. However, counsel for the Receiving Party may retain their work product, copies of court filings, and official transcripts with all exhibits thereto, provided any and all retained documents are kept confidential and will, along with the information contained therein, continue to be treated as Confidential or Highly Confidential pursuant to this Protective Order.
28. Non-Parties from whom discovery is sought by the Parties to this Protective Order may designate materials as Confidential or Highly Confidential, consistent with the terms of this Protective Order, provided that such Non-Parties agree in writing to be bound by the terms of this Protective Order prior to the production of any such materials by executing the Non-Disclosure Agreement annexed hereto as Appendix A. Under such circumstances, all duties applicable to the Parties that are signatories to this Protective Order shall apply to such Non-Parties. 29. This Protective Order is intended to be contractual in nature and may not be modified or changed orally. All changes or modifications shall be made in writing executed by the parties. 30. The Parties reserve the right to seek modification of this Protective Order by
application to the Court for good cause shown. 31. Until such time as this Protective Order has been entered by the Court, the Parties agree that upon execution by the Parties, the Parties will treat this Protective Order as though it had been “So Ordered.” [Remainder of page intentionally left blank] The undersigned counsel of record stipulate that the Court should enter the above Protective Order as an Order of the Court.
Dated: November , 2019 Dated: November , 2019 OFFICE OF THE NYS ATTORNEY GENERAL By ee BY Herbert Eisenberg, Esq. Johane Severin, Esq. Eisenberg & Schnell, LLP 28 Liberty St. 233 Broadway, Suite 2704 New York, New York 10005 New York, New York 10279 Tel.: (212) 416-8565 Tel.: (212) 966-8900 Attorneys for Plainti Attorneys for Defendants
SO ORDERED:
Jesse ef Datef: January 22, 2020
This stipulation and order binds the parties to treat as confidential the documents so classified. This Court, however, has not reviewed the documents referenced herein; therefore, by so ordering this stipulation, the Court makes no finding as to whether the documents are confidential. That finding will be made, if ever, upon a document-by- document review pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Court’s Individual Rules and Practices and subject to the presumption in favor of public access to “judicial documents.” See generally Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga, 435 F.3d 110, 119-20 (2d Cir. 2006). To that end, the Court does not “so order” any provision (e.g., Paragraph 10) to the extent that it purports to authorize the parties to file documents under seal without a prior court order. See New York ex rel. Khurana v. Spherion Corp., No. 15-CV-6605 (JMF), 2019 WL 3294170 (S.D.N.Y. July 19, 2019).
-14-
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK MOHAMMED SADAT, M.D.,
Plaintiff,
– v. – No. 19-cv-5053 (JMF)
STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK UPSTATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, et. al., Defendants.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT I hereby acknowledge that I have read a copy of the Confidentiality Stipulation and Order (“Protective Order”) entered in the Litigation presently pending in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entitled Sadat v. State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Mantosh Dewan, M.D., P. Sebastian Thomas, M.D., and Carlos J. Lopez, M.D. , No. 19-CV-5053 (SDNY) (JMF), that I understand the terms thereof and agree to be bound by its terms, and that I submit myself to the jurisdiction of the Court, wherever I may be, for the enforcement of this Protective Order. Signed under penalty of perjury of the laws of the United States of America, this _____ day of ______________, 20__.
____________________________________ Signature _______________________________________ Name (Printed)