Sacrey v. Sacrey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sacrey v. Sacrey

254 A.D. 823, 5 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7779

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 25, 1938·Published

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and cause remitted to the Special Term for a rehearing. (See Lee v. Lee, 203 App. Div. 467, and Lampson v. Lamp-son, 174 id. 851.) Finding of fact No, III and conclusions of law Nos. I and II disapproved and reversed. All concur, except Crosby, J., who votes for reversal on the law and for granting a decree of absolute divorce, and Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment dismisses the complaint on the merits in an action for absolute divorce.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and cause remitted to the Special Term for a rehearing. (See Lee v. Lee, 203 App. Div. 467, and Lampson v. Lamp-son, 174 id. 851.) Finding of fact No, III and conclusions of law Nos. I and II disapproved and reversed. All concur, except Crosby, J., who votes for reversal on the law and for granting a decree of absolute divorce, and Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for affirmance. (The judgment dismisses the complaint on the merits in an action for absolute divorce.) Present — Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham, Taylor and Dowling, JJ.

Sacrey v. Sacrey, 254 A.D. 823, 5 N.Y.S.2d 199, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7779 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

254 A.D. 823 (Sacrey v. Sacrey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related