Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Haugen

36 F.2d 948, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedDecember 17, 1929
DocketNo. 5720
StatusPublished

This text of 36 F.2d 948 (Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Haugen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Haugen, 36 F.2d 948, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307 (9th Cir. 1929).

Opinion

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

This is one of the Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Company eases.

The charge to the jury covers 20 pages of the printed transcript, and the major portion thereof, approximately 16 pages, is given to a discussion of the testimony. The comment and argument therein contained are of such character as to bring it within the condemnation of the rule recognized in our decision in Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Parker (No. 5680) 36 F.(2d) 926, another case in the same group this day decided.

Accordingly the judgment will be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Parker
36 F.2d 926 (Ninth Circuit, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
36 F.2d 948, 1929 U.S. App. LEXIS 2307, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacramento-suburban-fruit-lands-co-v-haugen-ca9-1929.