Sacqueland v. The Meteor

39 F. 512, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2337

This text of 39 F. 512 (Sacqueland v. The Meteor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sacqueland v. The Meteor, 39 F. 512, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2337 (circtedny 1889).

Opinion

Blatchford, J.

I think that, in view of the new proofs taken in this court, and of the whole case, the claim of Sacqueland for a mate’s wages must be disallowed, but that the claim of each of the five persons to whom the district court allowed $6.75 for board money must be allowed. As the claimant has succeeded as to the claim of Sacqueland for a mate’s wages, he must recover against Sacqueland the costs of this court; and, although the claim of Sacqueland, which is disallowed for a mate’s wages, was coupled with the allowed claims for board money, it seems equitable that costs in the district court should be allowed to those who recover for board money.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 F. 512, 1889 U.S. App. LEXIS 2337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacqueland-v-the-meteor-circtedny-1889.