Saco-Lowell Shops, a Division of Maremont Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

Fourth Circuit

Saco-Lowell Shops, a Division of Maremont Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board

405 F.2d 175, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2727, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4892

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedNovember 14, 1968

Docket12201_1

StatusPublished

This text of 405 F.2d 175 (Saco-Lowell Shops, a Division of Maremont Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saco-Lowell Shops, a Division of Maremont Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 405 F.2d 175, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2727, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4892 (4th Cir. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board found that Saco-Lowell Shops, a division of Maremont Corporation, had violated § 8(a) (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1), by the distribution of a handbook at its plant in Easley, South Carolina, containing a too rigid restriction upon the solicitation of employees to sign union authorization or membership cards, and had there also violated § 8(a) (3) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3), in discharging an employee because of his activities on behalf of the union. 169 N.L.R.B. No. 151 (February 28, 1968).

We are asked by the Board to enforce its remedial order; Saco-Lowell requests it be vacated. Our province is limited to the ascertainment of the substantiality of the evidence underlying the Board’s action. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). As we cannot say that the proof did not meet the requisite standard, we will enforce the decision of the Board.

Order enforced.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The National Labor Relations Board found that Saco-Lowell Shops, a division of Maremont Corporation, had violated § 8(a) (1) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (1), by the distribution of a handbook at its plant in Easley, South Carolina, containing a too rigid restriction upon the solicitation of employees to sign union authorization or membership cards, and had there also violated § 8(a) (3) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. § 158(a) (3), in discharging an employee because of his activities on behalf of the union. 169 N.L.R.B. No. 151 (February 28, 1968).

We are asked by the Board to enforce its remedial order; Saco-Lowell requests it be vacated. Our province is limited to the ascertainment of the substantiality of the evidence underlying the Board’s action. Universal Camera Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 340 U.S. 474, 71 S.Ct. 456, 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951). As we cannot say that the proof did not meet the requisite standard, we will enforce the decision of the Board.

Order enforced.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

405 F.2d 175, 69 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2727, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 4892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/saco-lowell-shops-a-division-of-maremont-corporation-v-national-labor-ca4-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack