Sacks v. Ventura

156 Misc. 656, 282 N.Y.S. 821, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1488
CourtCity of New York Municipal Court
DecidedAugust 31, 1935
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 Misc. 656 (Sacks v. Ventura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sacks v. Ventura, 156 Misc. 656, 282 N.Y.S. 821, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1488 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1935).

Opinion

Bernstein, J.

Motion to strike out the separate and distinct defense contained in the defendants’ answer is granted on the ground that the plaintiff’s claim arises by reason of section 13 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law, which section creates a statutory right as distinguished from the common-law remedy for personal injuries due to negligence, and the six-year Statute of Limitations, as provided by section 48 of the Civil Practice Act, applies rather than the three-year Statute of Limitations, as provided in section 49 of the Civil Practice Act.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Janes v. Sackman Bros. Co.
177 F.2d 928 (Second Circuit, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 Misc. 656, 282 N.Y.S. 821, 1935 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1488, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacks-v-ventura-nynyccityct-1935.