Sacks v. Sacks

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Sacks v. Sacks

254 A.D. 768, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 20, 1938

StatusPublished

This text of 254 A.D. 768 (Sacks v. Sacks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Sacks v. Sacks, 254 A.D. 768, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered in the office of the clerk of Kings county on March 7, 1938, granting the defendants’ motion for a separate trial with reference to the validity of the general release executed and delivered by the plaintiff affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order entered in the office of the clerk of Kings county on March 3, 1938, limiting the plaintiff’s motion for an examination of the defendants before trial and for a discovery and inspection modified by granting, in addition to the items granted by the Special Term, item 7 (d) and by permitting a discovery and inspection of the books of account, balance sheets and other records of the corporate defendants that will show the actual financial condition of such corporate defendants on or about the 1st day of October, 1933, and as so modified the order is affirmed, in so far as appeal is taken, without costs. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered in the office of the clerk of Kings county on March 7, 1938, granting the defendants’ motion for a separate trial with reference to the validity of the general release executed and delivered by the plaintiff affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Order entered in the office of the clerk of Kings county on March 3, 1938, limiting the plaintiff’s motion for an examination of the defendants before trial and for a discovery and inspection modified by granting, in addition to the items granted by the Special Term, item 7 (d) and by permitting a discovery and inspection of the books of account, balance sheets and other records of the corporate defendants that will show the actual financial condition of such corporate defendants on or about the 1st day of October, 1933, and as so modified the order is affirmed, in so far as appeal is taken, without costs. Examination to proceed on five days’ notice. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Close, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 A.D. 768, 6 N.Y.S.2d 140, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7536, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sacks-v-sacks-nyappdiv-1938.